assignment
Recruiting

Phase 3b, Randomized, Open‑Label, Active‑Controlled Trial Comparing Guselkumab Versus Risankizumab for Efficacy and Safety in Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease

Trial ID
2025-521590-13-00
Protocol
CNTO1959CRD3009

Trial statistics

science
3
test molecules
location_city
96
research sites
public
13
countries
medical_information
1
disease
person_search
114
investigators
handshake
8
vendors

Diseases & Conditions

Objectives

The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of subcutaneously administered guselkumab with intravenously or subcutaneously administered risankizumab at Week 52 in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease. Establishing relative clinical response will guide therapeutic decision‑making for this refractory inflammatory condition, while concurrent assessment of safety will characterize the tolerability profile of the two agents.

Participants

The trial enrolled 228 participants diagnosed with moderately to severely active Crohn’s Disease. Both male and female patients were eligible, and the age range corresponded to the adult categories indicated by the protocol’s age‑group codes. Inclusion required disease of at least 12 weeks’ duration with colitis, ileitis, or ileocolitis confirmed by radiography, histology, or endoscopy, a baseline Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score between 220 and 450, and endoscopic evidence of active ileal or colonic disease meeting specified SES‑CD thresholds. Participants must have shown an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to one or two prior advanced therapies targeting TNF‑α, integrin, IL‑12/23, or JAK pathways; exposure to three or more such classes was an exclusion criterion. Selection was based on these clinical parameters, and no specific dietary, physical activity, or other lifestyle requirements were stipulated.

Plans and Procedures

The study is a Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active‑controlled trial comparing guselkumab with risankizumab in participants with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease. Eligible individuals undergo a screening visit to confirm diagnosis, disease activity (CDAI ≥ 220 ≤ 450), and endoscopic criteria (SES‑CD score ≥4 or ≥6). Baseline assessments and the first dose are administered at the enrollment visit, after which participants receive guselkumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks or risankizumab 360 mg subcutaneously every 8 weeks for a total duration of 52 weeks. Follow‑up visits are scheduled at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 to evaluate efficacy, safety, and laboratory parameters, with an end‑of‑study visit at week 52 to determine the primary endpoint of deep remission. Participant involvement therefore extends for approximately one year from the first dose to the final assessment. Early termination may occur if a participant experiences a serious adverse event, fails to meet predefined safety criteria, withdraws consent, or requires prohibited concomitant therapy.

Treatment

The investigational product is guselkumab, supplied as a solution for injection in a pre‑filled syringe. It is administered by subcutaneous injection. The study protocol specifies a dose of 0 U per administration, with dosing frequency defined by the trial schedule.

The active‑comparator arm utilizes two formulations of Skyrizi, containing the monoclonal antibody risankizumab. One formulation is a 600 mg concentrate for solution for infusion, administered by intravenous infusion. The second formulation is a 360 mg solution for injection in a cartridge, administered by subcutaneous injection. Both comparator products are also dosed at 0 U per administration according to the study’s dosing schedule.

All study medications are dispensed in accordance with the assigned dosing schedule, and administration times are recorded in the case report form. Compliance is monitored through site‑performed verification of dose preparation, administration logs, and participant adherence checks at each study visit.

Efficacy

Efficacy will be evaluated by the proportion of participants achieving deep remission at Week 52, which constitutes the primary endpoint for comparison of guselkumab versus risankizumab.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

check_circle

Inclusion Criteria

  • Has CD or fistulizing CD of at least 12 weeks’ duration, with colitis, ileitis, or ileocolitis, confirmed at some time in the past by radiography, histology, and/or endoscopy.
  • Have moderately to severely active CD, defined as baseline CDAI score ≥220 but ≤450.
  • Baseline endoscopic evidence of active ileal and/or colonic CD as assessed by central endoscopy reading at the screening endoscopy defined as a screening SES-CD ≥4 (for participants with isolated ileal disease) or ≥6 (for participants with colonic or ileocolonic disease), based on the presence of ulceration in any 1 of the 5 ileocolonic segments, resulting in the following specified ulceration component scores: a. aminimum score of 1 for the component of “size of ulcers” AND b. a minimum score of 1 for the component of “ulcerated surface”.
  • Demonstrated an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to: At least one ADT AND Limited to 1 or 2 of the following ADT classes that target: a. TNFα (eg, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab or biosimilars) b. Integrin (eg, vedolizumab or biosimilars) c. IL-12/23 (eg, ustekinumab or biosimilars) d. JAK (eg, upadacitinib) Note: Participants with an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to ≥3 ADT classes as listed above (in Biologics or oral ADTs section) are excluded from the study. Biologics and advanced oral therapies used to qualify a participant as having had an inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance must be approved for the treatment of CD in the country/territory of use. Inadequate response is defined as the presence of signs and symptoms of persistently active disease despite a history of completing a dosing regimen based on local labeling. Loss of response is defined as the recurrence of signs and symptoms of active disease during treatment following prior clinical benefit. Intolerance is defined as occurrence of a clinically significant AE on a therapeutic agent that is unresponsive to dose reduction or required discontinuation, and in the judgment of the investigator, precludes use of the therapeutic agent to treat CD.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, participant’s disease is appropriate to treat with the maintenance dosing regimens utilized in the study: guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w or risankizumab 360 mg SC q8w.
cancel

Exclusion Criteria

  • Has complications of CD, such as symptomatic strictures or stenoses, short gut syndrome, active draining stoma or significant fistulizing disease or any other manifestation anticipated to require surgerywithin the next year, could preclude the use of the CDAI to assess response to therapy, or would possibly confound the ability to assess the effect of treatment with guselkumab or risankizumab.
  • Stool culture or other examination positive for an enteric pathogen, including Clostridioides difficile (formerly known as Clostridium difficile) toxin, within 16 weeks before the first dose of study intervention unless a repeat examination is negative and there are no signs of ongoing infection with that pathogen. Note: Treatment and repeat testing can occur in the current screening period.
  • Currently has a malignancy or has a history of malignancy within 5 years before screening (with the exception of a nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been adequately treated with no evidence of recurrence for 12 weeks before the first dose of study intervention or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence for ≥12 weeks before the first dose of study intervention). Note: Premalignant conditions (eg, gastric or esophageal metaplasia) should be discussed with the sponsor for eligibility determination.
  • Known history of lymphoproliferative disorder, lymphoma, leukemia, myeloproliferative disorder, multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease.
  • Meet ANY of the following TB screening criteria: a. Have a history of active TB or show signs or symptoms suggestive of active TB upon medical history and/or physical examination at screening. b. Have a history of untreated latent TB prior to screening. An exception is made for participants who are currently receiving treatment or will initiate treatment for latent TB prior to first administration of study intervention. c. Have had recent close contact with a person with active TB. An exception is made if such participants are referred to a physician specializing in TB to determine if treatment is warranted or not. This evaluation must be adequately documented and, if treatment is recommended, the participant must be receiving appropriate treatment prior to the first administration of study intervention. d. Have a positive IGRA test result within 5 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention. An exception is made for participants who: - have a history of adequately treated latent TB described above. - have a newly identified positive IGRA test result in which active TB has been ruled out and for which appropriate treatment for latent TB has been initiated prior to the first administration of study intervention. - have a false-positive IGRA test as determined by the following: o A suspected false-positive initial IGRA test must be repeated. If repeat testing is NOT positive, the participant must be referred to a physician specializing in TB to determine if the initial test can be considered a false-positive. This evaluation must be adequately documented prior to the first administration of study intervention. If repeat testing is positive, however, it will be considered a true-positive and the participant is only eligible if active TB has been ruled out and appropriate treatment for latent TB has been initiated as described above. e. Have a chest radiograph or chest computed tomography within 12 weeks prior to the first administration of study intervention that shows abnormalities suggestive of active or inactive TB.

Trial Status by Country

Country Status Start of Recruitment Planned Patients
Austria AustriaRecruiting11 Jun 202623
Belgium BelgiumRecruiting11 Jun 202619
Czechia CzechiaRecruiting11 Jun 202623
Denmark DenmarkRecruiting11 Jun 202623
France FranceRecruiting11 Jun 202628
Germany GermanyRecruiting11 Jun 202639
Hungary HungaryRecruiting11 Jun 202620
Italy ItalyRecruiting11 Jun 202618
The Netherlands The NetherlandsRecruiting11 Jun 2026
Poland PolandRecruiting11 Jun 202642
1–10 of 14
1 / 2

Sites & Investigators

Investigational Products

Details about the medicinal products being studied in this clinical trial.

Product Name Role in Trial Formulation Administration Max Daily Dose Treatment Duration EU MP Number
Guselkumab
TestSOLUTION FOR INJECTION IN PRE-FILLED SYRINGESUBCUTANEOUS USE0999PRD10890564
Skyrizi 360 mg solution for injection in cartridge
ComparatorSOLUTION FOR INJECTION IN CARTRIDGESUBCUTANEOUS USE0999PRD10081871
Skyrizi 600 mg concentrate for solution for infusion
ComparatorCONCENTRATE FOR SOLUTION FOR INFUSIONINTRAVENOUS USE0999PRD10081867

Conditions Studied in This Trial

Interventions Studied in This Trial

vaccines
Guselkumab
28 trials
vaccines
Risankizumab
25 trials